Juanma_-_Living_Changes-(HM2792)-WEB-2012-HB

11
Mar 2012
20:42
15
VBR
26 mb
admin
WebHardcoreHardcore Blasters
No votes yet

NFO
ARTIST.. juanma
TITLE... living changes
GENRE... hardcore
SOURCE.. WEB
LABEL... Hardcore Blasters
CAT NR.. HM2792
ENCODER. LAME 3.98
TRACKS.. 03
LENGTH.. 16:04 min
SIZE.... 26,7 MB
QUALITY. VBRkbps / 44,1kHz / joint-stereo
DATE.... mar-11-2012
URL..... amazon.co.jp

NOTES
Like ?? = Buy

TRACKLIST
NR. TRACKNAME                                            TIME
01  living changes                                        05:00
02  trap you                                              05:36
03  gantz                                                05:28

TOTAL 16:04 min
SIZE.  26,7 mb

Download linksAlerte!

Report invalid link

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4
i
M
F
w
f
Enter the code without spaces and pay attention to upper/lower case.

Comments ( 15 )
#1

deposit pls!

#2

Whoehoeeeeeeee Finally:D:D

#3

great release

#4

When on 320? :(

#5

When stop ask stupid question?

#6

why on 220 kb/sec ? :(

#7

There's no difference..

#8

going to wash your ears man

#9

dude you have to wash your ears. A human cannot hear the frequence VBR cuts off so WTF

why do you think al CD scene releases are in VBR ??? you don't hear anyone complaining about cd rips right ??

#10

It depends. ;) But yes - most people can't hear the difference between 320 and VBR. Especially on shitty headphones. ;P

#11

Oh, there is censure? :D I wrote s h i t t y, and now its "greatty". :D

#12

Yes, there is. It's FU.CK.ING ridiculous.

#13

You can definietly hear the difference between VBR and 320 kbps mp3 if you compare them, even in headphones. Saying different is not true. The thing that some have problem with is that they dont know what to listen to in order to compare, spot the differences. This can mostly be trained in.

"why do you think al CD scene releases are in VBR ???" Beucase they are ripped like that. Most people dont care, they just want to listen to the music. Wich is fine by me, Im not the one desiding what quality other people think is good, and thank science for that. Would be booring if I did. Also, if You are not saticfied with the quality presented here, then buy it in the typ of quality You think is OK.

#14

Track one is very nice

#15

http://www21.zippyshare.com/v/27666401/file.html
320kbps reales

Post new comment

Don't ask for zippy. All reuploads/requests here: http://xprm.net Avoid abusive language. Write in English. Advertising & spam is not allowed. Random censorship enabled.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Q
3
t
C
i
V
Enter the code without spaces and pay attention to upper/lower case.