ARTIST..[ Delete
TITLE...[ Dismissed / Level
GENRE...[ Techno
SOURCE..[ WEB
LABEL...[ Theracords
CAT NR..[ THER-127
ENCODER.[ LAME 3.98
TRACKS..[ 02
LENGTH..[ 10:37 min
SIZE....[ 24,4 MB
QUALITY.[ 320kbps / 44,1kHz / Joint-Stereo
DATE....[ Jul-09-2014
URL.....[ www.hardstyle.com
NOTES
LiKe??? = BuY!!!
TRACKLIST
NR. TRACKNAME TIME
01 Dismissed 05:24
02 Level 05:13
TOTAL[ 10:37 min
SIZE.[ 24,4 mb
oh come on guys, ok, it's rawstyle, but he always uses the same sounds, his tracks sound very boring. same kicks, basses, synths :(
I don't know the rest of the tracks. But level is cool! All other tracks of delete doesn't have much power in the kicks and in level is it over 9000 <3
Haha! Best bullshit wroten on this topic! You are so funny guy!
Maybe you can do better? I don't think so shut up to say that! ^^
This is one of the best raw releases this year! ^^
I actually quite like this, it's not too bad, but why in the hell has the term "rawstyle" popped up when it.is.just.slow.hardcore.
You can't just start making hardcore and decide to coin another name for it when it's no different whatsoever.
I'll say it slowly so you can keep up.
It.is.just.slow.hardcore.
There, understand now?
Hardcore has been around for what, 25 years now? In all that time it's spawned many genres, many sounds, stuff that sounds exactly like this from 15 - 20 years ago, it was all still just... hardcore. You see?
I understand very well, but I refuse to understand bulls***.
If you think this is hardcore slowed you have some serious hearing problems man.
What would hardcore? the metric? sounds? the kicks?
You know there's a problem when genres just melt into each other and become indistinguishable. Why is there a market for rawstyle? It was an audience already served by hardcore, what does it offer that mainstream hardcore doesn't?
Some rawstyle tracks has some hardcore influences,this is true. But this is absolutely not.
It offers the hardness mainstream hardcore lost somewhere around 2009/2010 :). Mainstream hardcore is a joke nowadays. Then again, the whole composition of rawstyle tracks is different from how hardcore is composed. Breaks are longer, the beat stops more often, intro's are only 25 seconds and the melody consists of screeches most of the times.
Well we both agree on mainstream being a joke today, but if something like a longer break and just screeches (which hardcore used to use to death in the early - mid 2000s) and the length of an intro is what is used to define a supposedly completely different genre, that's pretty weak and half-arsed.
I hope you can hear the differences yourself ;). If rawstyle sounds like hardcore, it sounds like the older hardcore, not the recent crap, so there is your market. The kicks in older hardcore are more banging than rawstyle kicks, more distorted and the atmosphere and flow are different in hardcore tracks. I have no trouble hearing the difference myself :).
The only reason rawstyle became a thing is because you can't put someone like Delete or Warface on a normal hardstyle stage, because the stuck-up mainstream people won't accept it. Has been like that for years in hardcore, hence the darkcore genre we had a while.
Man I wish the old Supreme Intelligence/Gangsta/Enzyme etc darkcore and artcore stuff was still around. I was playing this Delete track to a friend and we both agreed it was similar to the older Enzymes in its feel. Whether anyone else agrees I don't know.
It's one of the Harderstyle sub-genres to correct the anon fucktardo, not slow Hardcore/Gabber... Harderstyles+sub-genres came from hard and trancy elements but again anon fucktardo, these styles do evolve, unlike your slow hardcore brain.... nuff said! DELETE BE REPPIN' MY COLOURS YOU FOOL.....
PPL talkin sh!t... get a life wank!
ps: the doctor never slapped your mother hard enough "anonymous" just saying...